Coase Theorem vs Pigouvian Tax
Coase Theorem and Pigouvian Tax are two Market Failure & Government concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. In short: coase theorem is the Coase theorem holds that if property rights are clear and bargaining is costless, private parties can negotiate to fix externalities efficiently. Meanwhile, pigouvian tax is a Pigouvian tax is a tax on a good with a negative externality, set equal to the external cost to restore the efficient quantity. Here is how they compare side by side.
The Coase theorem holds that if property rights are clear and bargaining is costless, private parties can negotiate to fix externalities efficiently.
It implies government intervention may be unnecessary when transaction costs are low and rights are well defined. The efficient outcome is reached regardless of who initially holds the rights. In practice, high bargaining costs and many affected parties limit its use.
A Pigouvian tax is a tax on a good with a negative externality, set equal to the external cost to restore the efficient quantity.
By raising the producer's marginal private cost up to the marginal social cost, it internalizes the externality. The tax reduces output to the socially optimal level and eliminates deadweight loss. A carbon tax is a common example.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.