Economies of Scale vs Economies of Scope
Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Economies of scale occur when long-run average total cost decreases as output increases. Economies of scope exist when it is cheaper to produce several products together than to produce each separately. Here is how they compare side by side.
This happens due to factors like specialization, bulk purchasing, or more efficient technology as the firm expands. It leads to lower per-unit costs and gives larger firms a cost advantage in the market.
They arise from sharing inputs, facilities, or expertise across product lines (e.g., a dairy making milk and cheese). Economies of scope are about variety of products, whereas economies of scale are about volume of a single product.
Economies of Scale vs Scope: More of One Good, or Two Goods Under One Roof
| Economies of Scale | Economies of Scope | |
|---|---|---|
| What varies between the two situations you compare | The quantity of one product | The number of products made inside one firm |
| The arithmetic you run | Divide total cost by output at two output levels, then compare cost per unit | Add the two standalone costs, then subtract the cost of making both together |
| Units of the answer | Cost per unit, which falls as output grows | A total cost saving, usually restated as a percentage of standalone cost |
| Where it appears on a graph | The downward-sloping stretch of the long-run average total cost curve | Nowhere on a single-good curve, since the comparison runs across separate cost functions |
| Typical source | Specialization, bulk input discounts, spreading indivisible capital over more units | Shared inputs, shared distribution, usable by-products, one brand covering both lines |
| Market structure it explains | Natural monopoly, where one large firm serves the market at the lowest cost per unit | Multi-product firms, where one firm carries a second line that looks unrelated |
Both can be measured on one creamery, using two different subtractions
A creamery can make milk, cheese, or both. Producing 60 units of milk alone costs $420. Producing 60 units of cheese alone costs $360. Producing both baskets together costs $660. Separate production totals $780, so the joint operation saves $120, roughly 15 percent. That saving is economies of scope, and notice what the calculation compares: two ways of producing the very same pair of outputs. Scale asks a different question of the same firm. Milk alone at 60 units costs $420, or $7.00 per unit, while milk alone at 120 units costs $720, or $6.00 per unit. Average cost fell as output rose, so the milk line has economies of scale. One comparison holds outputs fixed and changes how production is organized. The other holds the product fixed and changes the quantity. Running both calculations on one firm makes it obvious that these are not two degrees of the same idea, and it gives you a template for any stimulus that reports standalone and joint costs.
A firm can have economies of scope and diseconomies of scale at the same time
Change one figure in the creamery and the two verdicts split. Suppose milk alone at 120 units costs $960 rather than $720, which is $8.00 per unit, up from $7.00 at 60 units. The milk line now shows diseconomies of scale, perhaps because a second shift and a longer delivery route were needed to push volume up. The joint saving of $120 on the two 60-unit baskets is untouched, since it never depended on the volume of either line. The advice that follows is to stay diversified and stay small, a conclusion neither concept reaches on its own. That combination is the reason the two terms exist separately. A finding about one says nothing about the other, and an answer that treats scope as economies of scale for firms with several products will get the direction wrong every time the two point opposite ways.
Only one of the two has a graph you can be asked to draw
Economies of scale live on the long-run average total cost curve, so a question can ask you to draw that curve, label the downward-sloping stretch, mark minimum efficient scale where it flattens, and use the shape to argue that one firm serves the whole market more cheaply than two. Every step is graphical. Economies of scope have no such curve. The comparison needs the cost of a two-product basket and the cost of two one-product baskets, which are three separate cost figures rather than points along one function. Scope questions therefore arrive as words and numbers, while scale questions arrive as diagrams. Use that as a sorting rule under time pressure. A prompt showing a falling average cost curve and asking what it demonstrates is a scale question. A prompt describing a firm adding a second product line and saving money on shared delivery trucks is a scope question, and drawing a curve for it wastes time you do not have.
Frequently asked questions
Does a firm with economies of scope automatically have economies of scale?
Economies of scope and economies of scale are independent, so a firm can have either one without the other. Scope compares joint production against separate production at fixed output levels. Scale compares average cost at different output levels of one product. A creamery can save $120 by making milk and cheese together while its milk line's average cost climbs from $7.00 to $8.00 per unit as volume doubles. The sensible conclusion there is to stay diversified and stay small, which neither concept delivers alone.
Which concept explains why a natural monopoly forms?
Economies of scale explain natural monopoly. When long-run average total cost keeps falling across the entire range of market demand, one firm producing the whole quantity has a lower cost per unit than two firms splitting it, so a single supplier survives. Water distribution and electricity grids are the standard illustrations, since the fixed network is enormous and each additional customer adds very little cost. Economies of scope explain something else entirely: why one firm carries several product lines, not why one firm ends up alone in a market.
How do you calculate whether economies of scope exist?
Economies of scope exist when producing two goods together costs less than producing each alone at the same quantities. Add the two standalone costs, subtract the joint cost, and check the sign. In the creamery example, $420 plus $360 is $780, the joint cost is $660, and the difference of $120 is positive, so economies of scope are present. Dividing that $120 by $780 gives a saving of about 15 percent, which is how the result is normally reported.
Live Production Costs graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated