Moral Hazard vs Principal-Agent Problem
Moral Hazard and Principal-Agent Problem are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. In short: moral hazard is moral hazard occurs when one party takes greater risks because they do not bear the full consequences of those risks, often due to insurance or government protection. Meanwhile, principal-agent problem is the principal-agent problem arises when one party (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal) but has different incentives and better information. Here is how they compare side by side.
Moral hazard occurs when one party takes greater risks because they do not bear the full consequences of those risks, often due to insurance or government protection.
This happens after a transaction, such as when people drive recklessly because they have car insurance. It leads to market inefficiency because behavior changes in ways that increase costs for others. Governments may respond with co-pays or monitoring to reduce the incentive to take excessive risks.
The principal-agent problem arises when one party (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal) but has different incentives and better information.
Examples include shareholders (principals) and CEOs (agents), or voters and politicians. Because the agent may pursue its own interests, principals use contracts, monitoring, and incentive pay to align goals.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.