Structural Unemployment vs Cyclical Unemployment
Structural Unemployment and Cyclical Unemployment are two Unemployment & Inflation concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Structural unemployment is long-term unemployment that occurs when workers' skills do not match the jobs available. Cyclical unemployment is unemployment that occurs due to a decline in economic activity during a recession. Here is how they compare side by side.
Structural unemployment happens when there is a mismatch between the skills of the unemployed and the requirements of the available jobs. This can be caused by technological changes, shifts in consumer demand, or the relocation of industries. Structural unemployment often requires workers to retrain or relocate to find new jobs.
Cyclical unemployment is directly related to the business cycle. During an economic downturn or recession, the demand for goods and services decreases, leading to layoffs and higher unemployment. When the economy recovers and enters an expansion phase, cyclical unemployment tends to decrease as businesses hire more workers to meet the increased demand.
Structural vs Cyclical Unemployment: Will the Old Job Come Back?
| Structural Unemployment | Cyclical Unemployment | |
|---|---|---|
| Does the old job return? | No, the job or the demand for that skill is gone | Yes, workers are often recalled when demand recovers |
| Root cause | Skill or location mismatch, technology, wage floors above equilibrium | A fall in aggregate demand |
| Counts in the natural rate? | Yes | No |
| Effect on LRAS | A rise shifts LRAS left, potential output falls | None, LRAS does not move |
| Typical duration | Months to years, retraining or relocation required | Ends when the recessionary gap closes |
| Right policy response | Retraining, relocation help, licensing reform | Expansionary fiscal or monetary policy |
| Sector pattern | Concentrated in one declining industry or region | Broad, most sectors shed workers at once |
Hysteresis is the case where cyclical unemployment turns structural
The clean split between these two categories has one leak, and it is worth knowing. When a recessionary gap lasts long enough, some workers stay jobless so long that their skills decay and employers begin screening out long gaps on a resume. A machinist idled for two years is no longer competitive with one who never stopped working. The unemployment did not vanish when demand returned, it changed category. The cyclical component became structural, and because structural unemployment counts toward the natural rate, the natural rate itself rises and LRAS shifts left. This is the argument for responding to a recessionary gap quickly instead of waiting for self-correction. The self-correcting mechanism assumes nominal wages fall, SRAS shifts right, and the economy returns to its original potential output. Hysteresis says the potential output you return to can be lower than the one you left. No other pair of unemployment types has this crossover, which is why the structural versus cyclical distinction turns on duration as well as cause.
A binding wage floor produces structural unemployment even in a boom
Classification questions often bury a minimum wage inside a stem about a recession, and the two effects are separate. Suppose the equilibrium wage in a labor market is 15 per hour and a floor is set at 18. At 18 the quantity of labor supplied is 90 workers and the quantity demanded is 74, leaving a surplus of 16 workers who want the job at that wage and cannot get it. Those 16 are structurally unemployed. The mismatch is between the wage the rule requires and the value employers place on that labor, and no amount of demand stimulus removes it, because the surplus exists at the floor no matter where AD sits. Efficiency wages and union contracts create the same effect by a different route. Now layer a recession on top. AD falls, labor demand shifts left, and the surplus at the floor grows past 16. The extra joblessness from the demand shift is cyclical and will unwind when spending recovers. The original 16 will not, which is why a stem that reports both a wage floor and a downturn is asking for two categories, not one.
The graphs separate them faster than the definitions do
On the AD/AS diagram, cyclical unemployment shows up as equilibrium output to the left of LRAS. Close that gap, through self-correction or expansionary policy, and cyclical unemployment goes to zero while LRAS never moves. Structural unemployment does not appear as a gap at all. A rise in it raises the natural rate, meaning fewer workers can be matched to jobs at any price level, so LRAS shifts left and potential output falls. The Phillips curve makes the same split. Cyclical unemployment is a movement along the short-run Phillips curve, down and to the right as inflation falls and joblessness rises. A change in structural unemployment shifts the long-run Phillips curve, and the short-run curve with it, because the vertical long-run curve sits at the natural rate. If a question asks you to shift LRAS or the long-run Phillips curve, the underlying story is structural or frictional. If it asks you to move along a curve, the story is cyclical.
Frequently asked questions
Is unemployment caused by automation structural or cyclical?
Automation produces structural unemployment. The job the worker held no longer exists at any level of aggregate demand, because a machine or a piece of software now does the task, so a recovery in spending will not bring the position back. The worker needs a different skill set or a different industry, which is why retraining and relocation are the standard policy answers rather than stimulus. Contrast that with a factory that furloughs a shift during a downturn and recalls the same workers when orders return, which is cyclical.
Can structural and cyclical unemployment rise at the same time?
Structural and cyclical unemployment usually rise together during a recession. Falling demand creates cyclical unemployment across most sectors, while the same downturn accelerates permanent closures in industries that were already shrinking, and those closures are structural. The practical separator is whether employers expect to recall the workers. Recalls point to cyclical unemployment, permanent separations in a declining industry point to structural. A long enough downturn also converts the first into the second, since skills decay while a worker waits and employers start screening out long gaps.
Why does structural unemployment shift LRAS when cyclical unemployment does not?
LRAS is drawn at potential output, the level the economy produces when unemployment sits at its natural rate. Structural unemployment is part of that natural rate, so an increase means fewer workers can be productively matched to jobs no matter what the price level does, and potential output falls. Cyclical unemployment is by definition the deviation from the natural rate, so it describes where the economy sits relative to LRAS rather than where LRAS itself is.
Live Business Cycle graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated