FRQ answers · 2025 AP Microeconomics
2025 AP Microeconomics FRQ Answers Explained (Set 1)
This page works through all three free-response questions from the 2025 AP Microeconomics exam, Set 1: the Voda Reservoir monopoly, the Rushland rice market, and the Tony's Trinkets game-theory question. For each part you get a short plain-language restatement of what is being asked, then the full answer with the exact direction, label, or number the rubric rewards.
Every answer and point value here is checked line by line against College Board's official scoring guidelines, linked at the top of the page and on each question. Question 1 is the 10-point long FRQ; Questions 2 and 3 are 5 points each, for 20 points total in Section II. This covers the main released Set 1, and other exam forms exist, so if your prompt numbers differ, apply the same method to your own figures.
To use it well, answer each part yourself first, then self-score honestly against the point notes. Anywhere you drop a graph point, open the matching interactive graph on EconLearn and redraw it until the curves, labels, and shaded areas come out right without peeking.
Official question PDF: College Board, 2025 free-response questions · official scoring guidelines
Question 1: Monopoly with a loss, subsidy, elasticity, and labor markets
10 points · Practice on the interactive monopoly graph
Part (a)
Draw the single-firm monopoly graph and mark its profit-maximizing quantity and price, an ATC curve consistent with a loss, and the shaded deadweight loss.
Draw a downward-sloping demand curve (D) with a marginal revenue curve (MR) below it, plus an upward-sloping marginal cost curve (MC).
Find QM where MR = MC, then drop straight down to label the quantity axis.
Read PM up from QM to the D curve and across to the price axis; price always comes off demand, not MR.
Because the firm earns a loss, draw the ATC curve entirely above the demand curve at QM (so price is below ATC), with MC cutting ATC at ATC's minimum.
Shade the deadweight loss triangle between the D and MC curves, from QM out to the quantity where D meets MC.
5 points: D+MR below it; rising MC, QM at MR=MC; PM off demand; ATC above demand, MC through its min; shaded DWL.
Part (b)
On the part A graph, mark the socially optimal (allocatively efficient) quantity of bottled water.
Label QS where the demand curve intersects the MC curve.
Allocative efficiency requires price (the marginal benefit read off D) to equal marginal cost, and D = MC is the only point that satisfies that. QS lies to the right of QM.
1 point: QS at the intersection of D and MC.
Part (c)
State what a per-unit subsidy does to the monopolist's profit-maximizing output and explain why.
The profit-maximizing quantity increases.
A per-unit subsidy lowers the firm's marginal cost, shifting MC down and to the right, so MC now meets MR at a larger quantity. Treating the subsidy instead as added revenue shifts MR right into MC at a larger quantity, which gives the same result.
1 point: quantity increases, with a valid MC (or MR) shift explanation.
Part (d)
Say whether demand for Voda's water becomes more elastic, less elastic, or unchanged as rival producers enter.
Demand for Voda Reservoir's water becomes more elastic.
New producers give buyers more substitutes, and more available substitutes make a firm's own demand more responsive to its price changes.
1 point: more elastic.
Part (e-i)
State what happens to Voda's demand for labor when demand for bottled water rises, and explain.
Voda's demand for labor increases.
Higher demand for bottled water raises its price and the firm's marginal revenue, which raises the marginal revenue product of labor (MRP = marginal product times marginal revenue). Since labor demand is the MRP curve, it shifts right.
1 point: labor demand increases, explained through a higher marginal revenue product of labor.
Part (e-ii)
State the short-run effect on the market wage of raising the minimum working age, and explain.
The market wage increases in the short run.
Raising the minimum employment age removes some potential workers, decreasing labor supply. With supply shifted left along a given labor demand, the equilibrium wage rises.
1 point: wage increases, explained by a leftward shift (decrease) in labor supply.
Question 2: Surplus, a price floor, and international trade in a rice market
5 points · Practice on the interactive supply and demand graph
Part (a)
Calculate total economic surplus at the market equilibrium and show the work.
Total economic surplus is $270.
Equilibrium is Q = 60 at P = $4, where supply meets demand.
Surplus is the triangle between demand and supply from 0 to 60: (1/2) x ($10 - $1) x 60 = (1/2) x $9 x 60 = $270. Splitting it also works: CS = (1/2) x $6 x 60 = $180 plus PS = (1/2) x $3 x 60 = $90.
1 point: $270 with supporting work.
Part (b)
State whether a $3 price floor produces a surplus, a shortage, or neither, and explain.
Neither a surplus nor a shortage.
The equilibrium price is $4, so a floor set at $3 sits below equilibrium and is non-binding. The market still clears at $4 and 60 bushels, so no surplus or shortage forms.
1 point: neither, because the floor is below equilibrium (non-binding).
Part (c-i)
At a world price of $5, state whether Rushland exports or imports rice and support it with graph numbers.
Rushland exports rice.
At $5, domestic quantity supplied is 80 bushels while domestic quantity demanded is 50 bushels. Supply exceeds demand by 30 bushels, and that 30-bushel surplus is exported.
1 point: exports, supported by Qs = 80 > Qd = 50 (a 30-bushel surplus).
Part (c-ii)
Calculate domestic consumer surplus once Rushland trades at the world price, and show the work.
Domestic consumer surplus is $125.
At the world price of $5, domestic quantity demanded is 50 bushels. CS is the triangle under demand and above $5: (1/2) x ($10 - $5) x 50 = (1/2) x $5 x 50 = $125.
1 point: $125 with supporting work.
Part (c-iii)
Calculate the total revenue Rushland's farmers earn at the world price, and show the work.
Total revenue is $400.
Farmers produce the quantity supplied at $5, which is 80 bushels, and sell every bushel at the world price: $5 x 80 = $400.
1 point: $400 with supporting work.
Question 3: Game theory: dominant strategy, Nash equilibria, and a merger
5 points
Part (a)
Given that Bitaly picks Silver, state whether Unique is Tony's best choice and use the payoff numbers.
No.
If Bitaly chooses Silver, Tony earns $20 from Unique but $21 from Typical. Since $21 > $20, Typical is the better response, so Unique is not Tony's best choice.
1 point: No, because Typical's $21 beats Unique's $20 in the Silver column.
Part (b)
State whether Bitaly has a dominant strategy and justify it with the payoff numbers.
Bitaly has no dominant strategy.
When Tony plays Unique, Bitaly prefers Gold ($21 > $19). When Tony plays Typical, Bitaly prefers Silver ($16 > $7). Because Bitaly's best choice depends on Tony's choice, no single strategy dominates.
1 point: no dominant strategy (Gold best vs Unique, Silver best vs Typical).
Part (c)
Identify every Nash equilibrium in the game.
There are two Nash equilibria: (Unique, Gold) with payoffs $15, $21, and (Typical, Silver) with payoffs $21, $16.
In each of these, neither firm can raise its own profit by switching strategies while the other holds still.
1 point: both (Unique, Gold) and (Typical, Silver).
Part (d)
From the listed options, give the smallest profit increase to Typical that makes it Tony's dominant strategy.
$6.
Typical already beats Unique when Bitaly plays Silver ($21 > $20). The binding case is when Bitaly plays Gold, where Typical's $10 must exceed Unique's $15, so the increase must be more than $5. Of the choices ($2, $4, $6, $11, $15), $6 is the smallest that pushes $10 to $16 > $15.
1 point: $6.
Part (e)
If the two firms merge to maximize combined profit, calculate the largest combined profit and show the work.
The maximum combined profit is $39.
Add the two payoffs in each cell: Unique/Gold = 36, Unique/Silver = 39, Typical/Gold = 17, Typical/Silver = 37. The largest sum is $20 + $19 = $39 at Unique, Silver.
1 point: $39 (Unique, Silver: $20 + $19).
Frequently asked
- How many points is each question on the 2025 AP Microeconomics FRQ?
- Question 1 is worth 10 points, and Questions 2 and 3 are worth 5 points each, for 20 points total in the free-response section.
- What topics were on the 2025 AP Microeconomics FRQ?
- Set 1 covered a monopoly earning a loss (with a per-unit subsidy, demand elasticity, and labor-market follow-ups), a supply-and-demand rice market with a price floor and international trade, and a two-firm game with dominant strategies, Nash equilibria, and a merger.
- What is the answer to the 2025 AP Micro game theory question?
- Bitaly has no dominant strategy, the two Nash equilibria are (Unique, Gold) and (Typical, Silver), the minimum profit increase for Typical to become dominant is $6, and the merged firm's maximum combined profit is $39 at Unique, Silver.
- Are these 2025 AP Microeconomics FRQ answers official?
- The questions and point allocations come straight from College Board's released Set 1 exam and its official scoring guidelines, both linked on this page. The written explanations are EconLearn's own.
Missed a graph? Drill it before your exam.
Draw the Graph grades 111 FRQ-style prompts from the geometry of what you draw, and the sandbox lets you drag every model on this page until the shifts are automatic.
Other released FRQ sets
- 2026 AP Microeconomics — 3 questions, worked point by point
- 2026 AP Macroeconomics — 3 questions, worked point by point
- 2025 AP Macroeconomics — 3 questions, worked point by point