Taylor Rule vs Inflation Targeting
Taylor Rule and Inflation Targeting are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. The Taylor rule is a formula prescribing how a central bank should set the policy interest rate based on inflation gaps and the output gap. Inflation targeting is a framework in which a central bank publicly commits to a numerical inflation goal and sets policy to reach it over the medium term. Here is how they compare side by side.
It says the central bank should raise the nominal rate when inflation exceeds its target or output exceeds potential, and lower it otherwise, with weights (typically 0.5 each) on the inflation gap and output gap. It represents a rules-based alternative to discretionary policy and is often used as a benchmark to judge whether the Fed's rate is 'too high' or 'too low.'
The central bank announces a target for a named price index, publishes forecasts, and explains itself when it misses. The purpose is to anchor expectations, because if firms and workers believe inflation will return to the target, they set prices and wages on that basis, which makes the target partly self-fulfilling and lowers the output that has to be given up to keep inflation down. Targets are set slightly above zero rather than at zero, both to leave room to push real rates below zero in a downturn and because standard price indexes tend to overstate the true rise in the cost of living. A target is a goal for an outcome, not an instrument. The policy rate is the instrument, and most targeters run a flexible version that also weighs output and employment.
Taylor Rule vs Inflation Targeting: A Formula and a Framework
| Taylor Rule | Inflation Targeting | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An equation that prescribes a policy rate | A public commitment to a stated inflation goal |
| What it pins down | The exact rate, once you plug in the data | The objective, not the rate used to reach it |
| Room for judgement | Very little if it is followed mechanically | Considerable, provided the goal is met over time |
| Inputs | An inflation gap and an output gap | Any forecast the committee finds relevant |
| How output is treated | It enters the formula directly | It matters mainly through its effect on future inflation |
| How the public checks it | Compare the actual rate with the formula's answer | Compare realised inflation with the announced goal |
| How the two relate | Often used as a benchmark for judging a targeting bank | The framework that a rule like this can serve |
The formula reacts more than one for one, and that is the whole design
A standard version sets the policy rate equal to a neutral real rate, plus current inflation, plus half the gap between inflation and its goal, plus half the output gap. Use illustrative figures: a neutral real rate of 2 percent, inflation of 4 percent, a goal of 2 percent and an output gap of plus 1 percent. The prescribed rate is 2 plus 4 plus half of 2 plus half of 1, which is 2 plus 4 plus 1 plus 0.5, or 7.5 percent. Now let inflation rise to 5 percent with everything else unchanged. The rate becomes 2 plus 5 plus half of 3 plus half of 1, which is 9 percent. Inflation rose by 1 percentage point and the prescribed nominal rate rose by 1.5. That is deliberate. Subtract inflation and the real rate went from 3.5 percent to 4 percent, so policy genuinely tightened rather than merely keeping pace. A rule that moved the nominal rate one for one would leave the real rate flat and do nothing to restrain demand. Practise separating the two rates at /calculate/real-interest-rate, because this distinction is where most exam answers on rules go wrong.
A target commits to the destination and leaves the route open
Inflation targeting specifies no formula. A central bank announces a numerical goal, say 2 percent for illustration, states the horizon over which it intends to reach it, and then explains its decisions against that yardstick. The value of the arrangement is that it anchors expectations. If workers and firms believe inflation will return to the stated number, they set wages and prices on that basis, and the belief helps deliver the outcome. That is why targeting regimes lean so heavily on communication, and why /glossary/forward-guidance sits naturally alongside them. The cost is that a promise without a formula is harder to verify, since any decision can be justified by an unobservable forecast. This is exactly the gap a rule fills. Commentators compute what a mechanical rule would prescribe and use the difference as a starting point for asking why the committee chose otherwise, which is a question a central bank can answer rather than a verdict. Very few institutions actually delegate the decision to an equation, partly because the neutral real rate and the output gap have to be estimated and both estimates move. The overall framework is set out at /macro/monetary-policy.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the Taylor rule and inflation targeting?
The Taylor rule is a formula that outputs a specific policy rate from inflation and output data, while inflation targeting is a framework that commits a central bank to an inflation goal without dictating how to reach it. A rule tells you the answer, and a target tells you what counts as success.
Do central banks actually follow the Taylor rule?
Very few follow it mechanically, and most treat it as a reference point rather than an instruction. Two of its inputs, the neutral real interest rate and the output gap, cannot be observed directly and have to be estimated, so different reasonable estimates produce noticeably different prescriptions.
Why must the policy rate rise by more than inflation does?
Because it is the real interest rate, the nominal rate minus inflation, that influences borrowing and spending. If the nominal rate only matches the rise in inflation, the real rate is unchanged and policy has not tightened at all, so a rule has to respond more than one for one to actually restrain demand.
Live Phillips Curve graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated