Wage Discrimination vs Compensating Differential
Wage Discrimination and Compensating Differential are two Labor Economics concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Wage discrimination is paying equally productive workers different wages because of a personal characteristic such as race or sex rather than their output. A compensating differential is the extra pay needed to attract workers to undesirable, dangerous, or unpleasant jobs. Here is how they compare side by side.
Economists define wage discrimination narrowly: two workers with the same marginal revenue product are paid differently because of who they are. Taste based discrimination is prejudice, held by an employer, co-workers or customers, that acts like an extra cost of employing the disfavored group. Statistical discrimination involves no prejudice at all, because an employer who cannot observe an individual's productivity cheaply falls back on group averages, so the individual is judged by the group. Competition pushes against the taste based kind, since a rival who hires underpaid workers gets the same output for less, while monopsony power, entry barriers and search frictions blunt that pressure. A raw pay gap between two groups is not the same thing, because it also reflects differences in hours, experience, occupation and job risk.
Risky or unpleasant jobs must pay more than otherwise-similar pleasant jobs to fill them. It explains part of why wages differ across occupations beyond skill differences.
Wage Discrimination vs Compensating Differential: Two Reasons Pay Differs
| Wage Discrimination | Compensating Differential | |
|---|---|---|
| What the gap tracks | A personal characteristic unrelated to output | A feature of the job itself |
| Productivity of the two workers | Equal, which is what makes it discrimination | May be equal; the working conditions are not |
| What the gap attaches to | The person, and it moves with them | The position, and it stays put |
| Which side is paid more | The favored group, for identical work | Whoever takes the worse job, to fill it at all |
| Effect on efficiency | Misallocates talent and wastes output | Allocates workers to jobs otherwise refused |
| Legal status | Prohibited on protected characteristics | Legal and expected |
| What competition does to it | Erodes it, since underpaying is costly to the firm | Preserves it, since the gap is what fills the role |
One gap attaches to the worker, the other attaches to the job
Start with two pay gaps that look identical on a spreadsheet. In the first, a warehouse pays 20 an hour on the day shift and 23 on the night shift. The tasks are the same and the workers are equally productive, but the night shift is harder to staff, so the extra 3 an hour exists to attract anyone at all. Over a 2,000-hour year that is 6,000 of additional pay, and it is a compensating differential: the market's price for an unpleasant feature of the job. In the second gap, two workers on that same night shift, with the same output and the same experience, are paid 23 and 20.70. The lower figure is 10 percent below the higher one, and the only thing separating the two people is a personal characteristic. That is wage discrimination. The test that sorts one from the other is easy to state. Ask whether the gap would survive if you swapped the two workers between the positions. A compensating differential follows the job and would stay exactly where it was. Discrimination follows the person and would move with them. See /glossary/marginal-revenue-product for the benchmark that says pay should track what a worker adds to revenue.
Competition erodes one of them and protects the other
The two gaps meet opposite fates in a competitive market. A compensating differential is doing a job. It is the price that persuades someone to take the night shift, the dangerous site or the posting far from home. Remove it and the position goes unfilled. Competition therefore protects it, and a firm that paid the night shift the same as the day shift would find itself short-staffed after dark. Wage discrimination points the other way. If two workers add the same amount to revenue and one is paid less, the underpaying employer is leaving money on the table, and a rival can profit by hiring the underpaid worker away. In principle that pressure grinds the gap down. In practice it works slowly and incompletely, because productivity is hard to observe, because workers do not move between employers without cost, and because discrimination running through customers or coworkers rather than the employer is far harder to compete away. Both concepts turn up in the same style of exam question, one that asks why two people earn different amounts. A full answer separates job characteristics, worker productivity and unequal treatment before drawing any conclusion. See /glossary/labor-mobility for the assumption that the competitive argument quietly relies on.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between wage discrimination and a compensating differential?
Wage discrimination pays equally productive workers different amounts because of a personal characteristic, while a compensating differential pays more for work that is dangerous, unpleasant or inconvenient. The first gap belongs to the person and the second belongs to the position.
Is it discrimination if dangerous jobs pay more?
No, paying extra for a dangerous job is a compensating differential, because the gap reflects a feature of the work rather than a feature of the worker. It would become discrimination only if two people doing that same dangerous job were paid differently for reasons unrelated to their output.
Why does competition not eliminate wage discrimination?
Competition punishes it in theory, since a rival can profit by hiring underpaid workers away, but the pressure is weak when productivity is hard to observe, when workers cannot easily change employers, and when the source is customers or coworkers rather than the employer. Those frictions let gaps last a long time.
Live Factor Markets graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated