Free Rider Problem
What is Free Rider Problem?
The free-rider problem occurs when people benefit from a good without paying for it, leaving it underprovided by the market.
It arises with public goods because they are non-excludable, so each consumer has an incentive to let others pay. This is why markets underprovide public goods and government often funds them through taxes. It is a key cause of market failure.
Free Rider Problem: a worked example
A hundred houses back onto a creek that floods. A levee would cost $40,000 and each household values it at $600, so the neighborhood gains 100 x 600 = $60,000 of protection from a $40,000 project, a net gain of $20,000. Split evenly, that is 40,000 / 100 = $400 per household. But once the levee is up it shields every house on the bank, paying or not, so each family's best individual move is to keep its $400 and let the other 99 cover the bill. Enough families reason that way and a project worth $20,000 more than it costs never gets built.
The mistake students make with free rider problem
Students file anything they get without paying under free riding, such as sneaking into a theater or borrowing a friend's streaming password. Those goods are excludable; the seller can lock you out and does. Free riding bites precisely when exclusion is impossible, so the provider has no way to tie payment to benefit. Test it by asking whether the provider could keep a non-payer from enjoying the good. If it could, the loss is theft or generosity, not the free-rider problem.
Free Rider Problem questions
Why can't a company just charge people for a public good?
A company cannot charge for a public good because it cannot keep non-payers from consuming it. A firm that built a levee or sprayed a town for mosquitoes would protect the household that refused to pay exactly as much as the one that paid, so revenue collapses and no private firm takes the job. Charging requires exclusion, and public goods are defined by the absence of it.
How do governments solve the free-rider problem?
Governments solve the free-rider problem mainly by removing the choice, since taxes are compulsory and the funding arrives whether a household would have volunteered or not. Two other routes exist. A subsidy can pay private producers to supply more, and technology can sometimes make a good excludable, the way scrambling turned open broadcasts into paid subscriptions.
Does free riding mean the good is never produced at all?
Free riding usually causes under-provision rather than zero provision. Some people still contribute out of habit, reputation or genuine care, which is why public radio pledge drives and volunteer fire departments exist at all. The economic problem is that the amount supplied falls short of the quantity where marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost, so society loses the value of every unit never produced.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated