Laissez-Faire
What is Laissez-Faire?
Laissez-faire is the principle that the economy works best with minimal government intervention in markets.
From the French for 'let do,' it holds that free competition and the price mechanism allocate resources efficiently without state interference. It is associated with classical economics and Adam Smith's invisible hand.
Laissez-Faire: a worked example
The town of Marlow caps firewood at $8 a bundle during a cold snap. At $8, local suppliers bring 400 bundles while residents want 900, so 500 bundles of demand go unmet and wood is rationed by whoever queues earliest. A laissez-faire council removes the cap. The price climbs to $14, high enough that sellers who would not haul wood in for $8 now do, until 750 bundles arrive and 750 are wanted. Nobody allocated the wood and nobody filed a form; the price did the rationing, and the shortage closed.
The mistake students make with laissez-faire
Laissez-faire gets read as no government at all. The classical version still assumes the state defines and enforces property rights, enforces contracts, runs courts, and provides defense, and classical writers also assigned it public works and basic schooling. What laissez-faire rules out is intervention in prices, output, and entry, not the legal scaffolding markets run on. Let do sounds like do nothing, which is why the confusion is tempting, but a market with no enforceable contracts is not a laissez-faire market, it is no market.
Laissez-Faire questions
Is laissez-faire the same as capitalism?
Laissez-faire is a position on how much government should intervene, while capitalism is a system of private ownership of capital. A capitalist economy can carry minimum wages, licensing rules, antitrust enforcement, and a large welfare state and still be capitalist. Laissez-faire describes the low-intervention end of that range. Every laissez-faire economy is capitalist, but plenty of capitalist economies sit nowhere near laissez-faire.
What are the main criticisms of laissez-faire?
Critics of laissez-faire point to the situations where prices carry the wrong signal on their own: externalities such as pollution the producer never pays for, public goods nobody will fund voluntarily, monopoly power, and information gaps between buyer and seller. In each case following the market price does not produce an efficient result. Defenders answer that regulators have their own failure modes and can leave the outcome worse than the flawed market.
What is the difference between laissez-faire and Keynesian economics?
Laissez-faire holds that markets self-correct, so a downturn is best left to work itself out as wages and prices fall back to clearing levels. Keynesian economics holds that spending can stay depressed long enough for that correction to stall, so government should raise demand directly. The disagreement is about how quickly markets clear and how sticky wages are, not about whether markets work at all.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated