EconLearn

Poverty Trap

What is Poverty Trap?

A poverty trap is a self-reinforcing state in which being poor creates the conditions that keep you poor, so income stays low unless a push clears a threshold.

A trap requires returns to investment that are low at low levels of wealth and high above some threshold, which gives a household or an economy two stable resting points instead of one. Below the threshold, whatever can be saved is smaller than what depreciation, illness, emergencies or population growth take away, so any small gain erodes and income slides back down. Above the threshold, saving outruns those losses and the unit accumulates under its own power. The prediction is unusual and testable: a single transfer large enough to cross the threshold has a permanent effect, while a stream of small transfers is absorbed and changes nothing once it stops. Where returns are simply low at every level rather than rising above a threshold, there is one equilibrium and no trap, and a temporary transfer raises income only for as long as it lasts.

Poverty Trap: a worked example

A household earns 500 a year and needs 450 of it to eat, so it can save 50. Savings held as grain or cash lose 15 percent a year to spoilage, theft and small emergencies, so the largest stock it can ever build up is 50 / 0.15 = 333. A tool that would raise income to 800 costs 400, and because 333 is below 400 the household can never buy it: that is the trap, and it has nothing to do with the household being careless. Hand it the tool once, as a grant of 400, and income becomes 800, annual saving becomes 800 - 450 = 350, and the ceiling on its savings stock rises to 350 / 0.15 = 2,333, far above the 400 needed to replace the tool when it wears out. The extra 300 a year repays the grant in 400 / 300 = 1.3 years and the household stays out of the trap with no further help, which is what a threshold model predicts and a single-equilibrium model does not.

The mistake students make with poverty trap

Poverty trap gets used as a synonym for poverty, which empties the term of content. A trap requires two stable equilibria with a threshold between them, so that a temporary push produces a permanent change. If a household or country is poor simply because returns to investment are low at every level, it is poor but not trapped, and the right response is sustained support rather than one large push. Mislabelling reverses the policy conclusion, so whether the threshold actually exists matters far more than the phrase.

Poverty Trap questions

What is the difference between a poverty trap and just being poor?

Being poor describes a level of income, while a poverty trap describes a mechanism that pulls income back down whenever it rises a little. The test is what happens after a temporary boost: if income returns to where it started, a trap is operating, and if it settles somewhere higher, there was no trap. Only the trap case makes one large intervention better than steady smaller ones.

What is the big push argument in development economics?

The big push argument holds that several investments have to be made at once because each is only profitable if the others happen: a factory needs trained workers, roads and reliable power, and none of those pays for itself without the factory. A large coordinated program can carry an economy over the threshold in one move, while the same money spread thinly over many years is absorbed with no lasting effect. The counterargument is that governments rarely have the information or the discipline to coordinate investment at that scale.

Is there evidence that poverty traps are real?

The evidence is mixed and depends on the level you examine. Country-level evidence for a single national threshold is weak, since many of the poorest countries have raised incomes without any coordinated big push. Household-level evidence is stronger: randomized studies of programs that give very poor families a productive asset plus temporary consumption support have found income and asset gains that persist for years after the support ends.

Formula / Example

A trap exists when s x f(k) < (delta + n) x k for every k below a threshold k_T and s x f(k) > (delta + n) x k above it, so k_T separates a low steady state from a high one

Related terms

Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox

Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.

Keep track of what you have studied

A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.

Create a free account

Already have one? Sign in

Last updated

AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, EconLearn.