Ricardian Equivalence
What is Ricardian Equivalence?
Ricardian equivalence says a debt-financed tax cut leaves spending unchanged, because households save all of it to pay the future taxes the borrowing implies.
Government spending has to be paid for eventually, so choosing to borrow rather than tax changes only when the bill arrives, not its present value. A household that sees the deferred tax coming raises its own saving by exactly the amount of the tax cut, so consumption does not move and aggregate demand is unchanged. The result rests on strong assumptions: households must be forward-looking, able to borrow and lend freely, and willing to treat a tax that lands after their own lifetime as a cost to their heirs. Where any of those fail, and credit-constrained or short-sighted households are the usual break point, part of the cut gets spent and the ordinary tax multiplier reappears.
Ricardian Equivalence: a worked example
Say the government cuts taxes by 200 per household and borrows that 200 at 5 percent, so next year it must collect 200 × 1.05 = 210 from the same household. To meet a 210 bill one year out, the household needs 210 ÷ 1.05 = 200 set aside today, which is the entire tax cut. Consumption is flat, private saving is up 200, public saving is down 200, and national saving has not moved. Now let only 60 percent of households reason this way. The other 40 percent spend the cut, so consumption rises by 0.40 × 200 = 80 per household and the offset is partial rather than complete.
The mistake students make with ricardian equivalence
The common misreading is that Ricardian equivalence means deficits do not matter. It says that for a given path of government spending, the choice between taxing now and borrowing now has the same effect on demand; it says nothing about the spending itself, and a debt-financed rise in government purchases still lifts demand even under full equivalence. The other slip is treating the proposition as a measured fact rather than a benchmark. It is the zero-effect case that empirical work measures the partial offset against.
Ricardian Equivalence questions
Who developed Ricardian equivalence?
David Ricardo set out the argument and then rejected it as a practical guide, doubting that households actually behave that way. Robert Barro revived and formalized it, which is why the proposition is sometimes called the Barro-Ricardo equivalence theorem. The naming is awkward, because the economist it is named after did not think it described the world he lived in.
Does Ricardian equivalence hold in practice?
Full Ricardian equivalence does not hold, though a partial offset does. Households that cannot borrow against future income spend a tax cut rather than saving it, and people who discount the distant future heavily, or who expect the bill to land on someone else, behave the same way. What survives is the direction: a debt-financed tax cut raises consumption by less than the full size of the cut, because some households do save against the tax they see coming.
How is Ricardian equivalence different from crowding out?
Both predict that a debt-financed tax cut fails to lift output, but they run through different channels. Crowding out works through the loanable funds market, where government borrowing raises the real interest rate and squeezes private investment. Ricardian equivalence says private saving rises by the full amount of the borrowing, so the supply of loanable funds shifts out alongside demand, the interest rate never moves, and there is nothing left to crowd out.
Formula / Example
Related terms
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated