Asymmetric Information
What is Asymmetric Information?
Asymmetric information exists when one party in a transaction knows more than the other, which can lead to market inefficiency.
It causes problems such as adverse selection (before a deal) and moral hazard (after a deal). Used-car and insurance markets are classic examples. It can shrink or break markets unless remedies like warranties, screening, or signaling are used.
Asymmetric Information: a worked example
Fifty used cars are worth 9,000 dollars each to buyers and fifty are worth 3,000, but only the sellers know which is which. A buyer who thinks the odds are even offers the expected value, 0.5 x 9,000 + 0.5 x 3,000 = 6,000 dollars. Owners of the good cars will not sell below 7,500 dollars, so all fifty of them withdraw. Buyers who work this out cut their offers to 3,000, and only weak cars trade. Now let a seller add a transferable inspection warranty that costs 800 dollars to buy. A verified good car fetches 9,000, leaving its owner 9,000 - 800 = 8,200 dollars, which clears the 7,500 reservation price. An owner of a weak car would face repair payouts under that same warranty and will not buy one, and that gap is what makes the signal credible enough to restore the trade.
The mistake students make with asymmetric information
A common slip is labeling any uninformed buyer a case of asymmetric information. If neither party knows whether a car will need a new transmission, the ignorance is shared and the market can still price it correctly on average. The gap has to run one way, with the seller holding something the buyer cannot verify. Students also assume the market must disappear completely. In the car example only the good cars vanished while weak ones kept trading, so a partial collapse of quality is already the inefficiency the concept describes.
Asymmetric Information questions
What problems does asymmetric information cause?
Two problems follow from asymmetric information. Adverse selection arises before a contract, when a hidden trait of one side decides who chooses to trade, so the worst risks or the lowest quality goods crowd in. Moral hazard arises after a contract, when one side takes hidden actions the other cannot monitor. Both push a market away from efficiency, either by shrinking the volume of trade or by raising the cost of the trades that still happen.
What is the difference between signaling and screening?
Signaling comes from the informed side. A seller or job candidate takes a costly action only a genuinely high quality type would find worth the expense, such as offering a long warranty or finishing a demanding credential. Screening comes from the uninformed side. A buyer or employer designs an inspection, a test, or a menu of contracts that makes the other party reveal its type through the option it picks. Both narrow the gap without anyone simply announcing the truth.
Is asymmetric information a market failure?
Asymmetric information counts as a market failure because the unaided market outcome is inefficient. Trades that would raise total surplus never happen, since the uninformed side prices for the average and the highest quality sellers withdraw. Nothing about preferences or scarcity produces the loss, only the uneven distribution of knowledge. Warranties, licensing, disclosure rules, and independent inspection services exist to recover those missing gains from trade rather than to redistribute income between the parties.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated