Balanced Budget Amendment
What is Balanced Budget Amendment?
A balanced budget amendment is a constitutional rule requiring the government to keep annual spending within annual revenue, so it cannot run a deficit.
Most state constitutions already contain some version of this rule, and proposals appear regularly for the national level. The economic objection is that it would force spending cuts or tax increases exactly when a recession has shrunk revenue, which deepens the downturn and works against automatic stabilizers like unemployment insurance. Supporters answer that without a hard rule, deficits persist even in good years and the accumulated debt keeps growing. Most serious proposals therefore include escape clauses for war or recession, or require balance over the business cycle rather than every year. Note the target: the amendment constrains the annual deficit, which is a flow; the debt is the stock of past borrowing and falls only when surpluses run.
Balanced Budget Amendment: a worked example
Suppose a government plans outlays of $500 billion against revenue of $500 billion, a balanced plan. A recession then cuts tax collections to $440 billion while unemployment benefits push outlays to $520 billion, opening a deficit of $520 billion − $440 billion = $80 billion. Under a strict annual rule the government must close that $80 billion gap by cutting spending or raising taxes in the middle of the downturn, which reduces aggregate demand further. This procyclical squeeze is the standard argument against a rigid version of the rule.
The mistake students make with balanced budget amendment
Students think balancing the budget would pay off the national debt. Balancing only stops new borrowing; the existing debt stays until surpluses are run to retire it. The second mistake is assuming a balanced budget is always sound policy. Forcing balance during a recession means cutting spending or raising taxes when demand is already weak, which is why economists usually prefer balance over the cycle to balance every year.
Balanced Budget Amendment questions
Why do most economists oppose a strict balanced budget amendment?
A strict annual rule is procyclical: it forces tax increases or spending cuts precisely when a recession has already reduced revenue and raised safety net costs. That amplifies the downturn instead of cushioning it and disables the automatic stabilizers. Versions requiring balance over a full business cycle, or including recession escape clauses, avoid most of the problem.
Do U.S. states have balanced budget requirements?
Nearly all states operate under some balanced budget requirement written into their constitutions or statutes. The rules usually apply to the operating budget and still allow borrowing for capital projects like roads and school buildings. Because states cannot run large deficits in a recession, federal aid often fills the gap.
Would a balanced budget eliminate the national debt?
No, a balanced budget only prevents the debt from growing through new borrowing; it does not repay a dollar of what is already owed. Reducing the debt requires budget surpluses, where revenue exceeds outlays. Even without surpluses, the debt can shrink relative to the economy if output grows faster than the debt does.
Formula / Example
This is the live Fiscal Policy sandbox. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated