Carbon Tax
What is Carbon Tax?
A carbon tax is a fee on the carbon content of fuels, designed to make polluters pay for the external cost of emissions.
It is a Pigouvian tax that internalizes the negative externality of carbon emissions, raising the private cost up to the social cost and reducing pollution to a more efficient level. Revenue can fund rebates or green investment.
Carbon Tax: a worked example
Take a fuel market where inverse demand is P = 100 minus Q and marginal private cost is MPC = 20 plus Q, with Q measured in millions of tons. The unregulated equilibrium sets 100 minus Q equal to 20 plus Q, giving Q = 40 at a price of 60. Each ton burned imposes 30 dollars of external damage, so marginal social cost is MSC = 50 plus Q. Efficiency requires 100 minus Q equal to 50 plus Q, giving Q = 25 at a price of 75. A carbon tax of 30 dollars a ton lifts the supply curve onto the MSC line, so output settles at 25. Buyers pay 75, sellers keep 75 minus 30, or 45, matching their marginal cost of 20 plus 25. Revenue is 30 times 25, or 750 million dollars, and the deadweight loss removed is half of 15 times 30, or 225 million dollars.
The mistake students make with carbon tax
The tempting move is to set the tax equal to the total external damage, or to the whole price gap between the free market and the efficient outcome. The Pigouvian rate is the marginal external cost of one more unit, 30 dollars a ton in the market above, and nothing else. A related error assumes the correct tax should drive emissions to zero. Damage per ton is finite, so cutting past the point where abatement costs more than the harm avoided destroys surplus. The efficient quantity of pollution is positive, not zero.
Carbon Tax questions
How do economists decide the right carbon tax rate?
The target rate equals the marginal external cost of one more ton of emissions, measured at the efficient quantity. Pricing that damage means putting dollar figures on lost crop yields, heat-related illness, and property loss from rising seas, none of which trade in a market, so any chosen rate rests on estimates rather than an observed price. Once a rate is set, the tax raises private cost until it matches social cost, and buyers cut back to the quantity where marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost.
Is a carbon tax regressive?
Carbon taxes take a larger share of income from poorer households, because energy fills a bigger slice of a small budget. The tax also raises revenue, and the use of that revenue decides the final distribution. A flat per-person rebate returns the same dollar amount to everyone, which is worth more against a small income than a large one, so the package as a whole can leave lower-income households better off while the price signal on fuel stays fully intact.
Why tax carbon instead of banning it?
A ban forces every emitter to stop regardless of what stopping costs them, including firms whose only alternative is far more expensive than the harm they cause. A tax lets each firm compare its own abatement cost against the rate, so it cuts wherever cutting is cheaper than paying and the least expensive reductions happen first. Emitters that keep burning fuel pay for the damage they impose, and the standing price keeps rewarding anyone who invents a cheaper way to cut, which a fixed ban does not.
This is the live Externalities sandbox. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated