Social Cost of Carbon vs Carbon Tax
Social Cost of Carbon and Carbon Tax are two Environmental Economics concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. The social cost of carbon is an estimate of the total dollar damage caused by emitting one more ton of carbon dioxide, expressed in present value. A carbon tax is a fee on the carbon content of fuels, designed to make polluters pay for the external cost of emissions. Here is how they compare side by side.
Analysts build the number in steps: a climate model projects how one extra ton changes atmospheric carbon and temperature, a damage function converts those physical changes into dollar losses from things like lower crop yields, flooding and heat, and a discount rate collapses damages spread over future decades into a single present value. The result is a marginal external cost, so the textbook corrective tax on carbon is a per ton tax equal to it. Estimates vary widely, because the discount rate, the damage function and the treatment of low probability catastrophes are all contested, and a lower discount rate raises the number sharply. Do not confuse it with the price of a carbon permit, which comes from a market under a cap rather than from damage estimates.
It is a Pigouvian tax that internalizes the negative externality of carbon emissions, raising the private cost up to the social cost and reducing pollution to a more efficient level. Revenue can fund rebates or green investment.
Social Cost of Carbon vs Carbon Tax: The Estimate and the Policy
| Social Cost of Carbon | Carbon Tax | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An estimate of the damage done by one more ton of carbon dioxide | A legal charge collected on the carbon content of fuel |
| Who produces it | Economists and climate modelers, using damage models and a discount rate | A legislature or agency, which writes the rate into law |
| What it does by itself | Nothing to emissions, since it is a number used in analysis | Changes the prices firms and households face, so it changes behavior |
| Where it shows up | In cost-benefit tests of proposed rules, and as a target rate for a tax | In the price a fuel buyer actually pays at the pump or the meter |
| What makes it move | New damage estimates, and above all a change in the discount rate | A political decision to raise or lower the rate |
| How certain it is | A wide range, with reasonable estimates differing several times over | Exact, because it is a number written in the statute |
| Role in the pair | The efficiency benchmark | The instrument that tries to hit that benchmark |
The social cost of carbon is the number a carbon tax is trying to copy
Take a fuel market where demand is P equals 200 minus Q and private marginal cost is 50 plus Q, with all figures illustrative. Left alone the market settles where 200 minus Q equals 50 plus Q, at 75 units and a price of 125. Now suppose each unit burned does 30 dollars of damage to people outside the trade. Marginal social cost becomes 80 plus Q, and the efficient quantity is where 200 minus Q equals 80 plus Q, which is 60 units. The market overshoots by 15 units, and the value destroyed across those units is the triangle one half times 30 times 15, or 225 dollars. A tax of exactly 30 dollars a unit lifts private supply onto the social cost curve, and the market then lands on 60 units by itself with no further instruction. That 30 dollars is the job the social cost of carbon does: it is the damage estimate a /glossary/pigouvian-tax is set equal to. The estimate on its own changes nothing at all. It becomes policy only when a legislature turns it into a tax rate, a permit cap or a threshold in a cost-benefit test. The general method is at /calculate/socially-optimal-quantity.
The discount rate moves the estimate more than the physical science does
Two careful teams can produce very different social costs of carbon without either making a mistake, because most of the damage arrives decades ahead and has to be converted into present value. Consider 1,000 dollars of damage landing a hundred years out. Discounted at 3 percent its present value is about 52 dollars. At 5 percent it is about 7.60 dollars, close to seven times smaller, and nothing about the physical damage changed between those two calculations. See /calculate/present-value for the arithmetic. Choosing the rate is partly technical, resting on how fast income is expected to grow, and partly ethical, resting on how much weight to give people not yet born, and no data set settles the second half. The damage function adds a second source of spread, since it has to turn a temperature change into losses across agriculture, health, storm damage and productivity, and the evidence thins out badly at high temperatures. A third choice is whose damages to count, because an estimate covering global damages runs several times larger than one counting only damages inside the country writing the rule. None of this makes the number useless. It does mean any stated figure should be read together with the discount rate behind it.
Frequently asked questions
Should a carbon tax be set equal to the social cost of carbon?
In the standard model yes, because a tax equal to the marginal external damage makes the polluter face the full social cost of the last ton and pushes output to the efficient quantity. In practice rates are usually set below the estimate, since the number is uncertain and the rate is decided politically.
Why do estimates of the social cost of carbon vary so widely?
The discount rate is the biggest reason, because it decides what distant damage is worth today and can shift the answer several times over on its own. Assumptions inside the damage function, and the choice between counting global or domestic damages, account for most of the remaining spread.
Is the social cost of carbon a tax?
No, it is an estimate of damage per ton, it collects no money and it changes no prices on its own. A carbon tax is a charge written into law, while the social cost of carbon is one benchmark a legislature can use when deciding what that charge should be.
Live Externalities graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated