Clayton Act
What is Clayton Act?
The Clayton Act is a United States antitrust law banning mergers, tying and exclusive dealing where the effect may be to substantially lessen competition.
Congress added it about a quarter century after the Sherman Act, because that earlier statute mostly bit only after a restraint was already in place. The Clayton Act works on incipiency: a practice can be stopped once its likely effect is a substantial lessening of competition, or a tendency toward monopoly, before the harm actually arrives. It names practices instead of relying on general language, covering price discrimination between buyers, tying and exclusive dealing arrangements, mergers and acquisitions, and the same people sitting on the boards of competing firms. It also removed the doubt about whether labor unions counted as illegal combinations under antitrust law. Its merger provision is the part used most often, since it is the legal basis for reviewing, conditioning and blocking acquisitions.
Clayton Act: a worked example
The merger provision works through a notification system. Companies whose deal is above a size threshold must file with both antitrust agencies and wait a set period, initially thirty days, before closing, which lets reviewers look first rather than trying to unscramble a completed merger. If the filing raises questions, the agencies issue a further request for documents and data, and the waiting period extends until the parties comply. Many deals then settle: the buyer agrees to sell off the stores, plants or brands that overlap with the target, and the rest of the transaction proceeds.
The mistake students make with clayton act
Students mix up which act does what, and assume the Clayton Act bans mergers outright. It only reaches a deal that would probably reduce competition by a substantial amount, which leaves the great majority untouched. The cleanest way to keep the two straight is that the Sherman Act punishes restraints and monopolizing after the fact and can be criminal, while the Clayton Act is civil and stops named practices before they concentrate a market.
Clayton Act questions
What does the Clayton Act prohibit?
The Clayton Act prohibits mergers and acquisitions, tying arrangements, exclusive dealing contracts, certain forms of price discrimination between buyers, and interlocking directorates, in each case where the effect may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. All of these are civil matters rather than crimes.
How is the Clayton Act different from the Sherman Act?
The Clayton Act targets named practices before they harm competition, while the Sherman Act condemns restraints of trade and monopolizing in general terms once they exist. The Clayton Act is enforced civilly; the Sherman Act carries criminal penalties as well.
What is Section 7 of the Clayton Act?
Section 7 is the merger provision, which bars acquisitions of stock or assets where the effect may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. It is the basis on which regulators review, condition or block corporate takeovers.
This is the live Monopoly sandbox. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated