Barriers to Entry vs Switching Costs
Barriers to Entry and Switching Costs are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Barriers to entry are obstacles that make it difficult for new firms to enter a market and compete with existing firms. Switching costs are the costs a customer faces when moving from one seller to another, including fees, setup time, learning a new system and lost compatibility. Here is how they compare side by side.
These include legal restrictions like patents, high startup costs, control of essential resources, and economies of scale. Barriers allow existing firms to maintain market power and earn long-run economic profits.
Switching costs come in several forms: money, such as a cancellation fee or a new deposit; effort, such as reinstalling and relearning; and lost value, such as accumulated data, loyalty status, or compatibility with equipment already owned. They make a customer's demand less elastic once the first purchase is made, which lets the seller charge existing customers more than it needed to charge to win them. That produces the familiar pattern of a cheap introductory offer followed by rising renewal prices. They also work like a barrier to entry, because a newcomer must beat the incumbent's price by at least the cost of switching before anyone moves. Do not confuse them with sunk costs: a switching cost is a future cost the buyer pays only if it moves, so it should affect the decision, while sunk costs are already spent and should not.
Barriers to Entry vs Switching Costs: Who Exactly Is Being Held Back
| Barriers to Entry | Switching Costs | |
|---|---|---|
| Who faces the obstacle | A firm that wants to start selling | A customer who wants to change sellers |
| When the cost is paid | Before the entrant makes a single sale | At the moment the buyer moves |
| Typical examples | Patents, licences, large fixed costs, control of an input | Cancellation fees, retraining, moving records, lost compatibility |
| Effect on the number of sellers | Keeps it small | Leaves it unchanged, since rivals exist but cannot win customers |
| What it protects | Incumbents as a group | One firm's own installed base |
| How a rival gets around it | By paying the entry cost or inventing a way around it | By covering the customer's cost through discounts or free migration |
| How it shows up in the data | Few firms, and profits that entry never erodes | Many firms, and customers who stay put despite better offers |
A cheaper rival can lose a customer it has already beaten on price
Take an illustrative subscription that costs 30 dollars a month. A rival offers the same service for 22 dollars, so switching saves 8 dollars a month. Moving costs the customer 150 dollars once: a cancellation fee, an afternoon of setup, and the work of carrying records across. At 8 dollars a month, the saving needs 150 divided by 8, or 18.75 months, to cover that. A customer who expects to need the service for a year saves 12 times 8, or 96 dollars, which is less than the 150 dollars it costs to move. Staying put is the right call even though the rival is genuinely cheaper. For the rival to win that customer inside twelve months, it must offer 150 divided by 12, or 12.50 dollars a month of saving, which means pricing at 17.50 dollars rather than 22 dollars. Read the numbers again and notice what did not happen. Nothing kept the rival out of the market. It entered, it published a lower price, and it still lost. The obstacle sat on the buyer's side of the deal, which is exactly what separates this from an entry barrier, where the rival never appears at all.
One keeps the seller count low, the other keeps a low count from mattering
Entry barriers work on the supply side. A /glossary/patent makes it unlawful to copy the product, a licence limits who may operate, and a large fixed cost means a newcomer must be big on day one or lose money. The result is a short list of sellers and profits that do not get competed away, which is the standard picture of /glossary/market-power in a course. Switching costs leave the seller list alone. Rivals are present, their prices are visible, and buyers still do not move, so each firm holds its existing customers even when it is not the best offer available. The practical difference shows up in what a challenger has to spend. Against an entry barrier, the money goes into getting a product to market at all. Against switching costs, the product already exists and the money goes to the customer, in the form of an introductory discount, a paid out contract or free help with migration. Some economists therefore describe switching costs as a barrier to expansion rather than to entry, since they slow how fast a new firm grows rather than whether it can start.
Frequently asked questions
Are switching costs a barrier to entry?
Not in the strict sense, because a barrier to entry stops a firm from getting into a market at all, while switching costs let it in and then make its customers expensive to win. Many economists call them a barrier to expansion instead. The effect on profits is similar, since both let incumbents hold prices above what open rivalry would allow.
What are the main examples of barriers to entry?
The usual list is patents and other legal protection, government licences, very large fixed or sunk costs, control of a scarce input, and cost advantages that only come with scale. Each stops a would be seller before it makes a first sale. Network effects and long term exclusive contracts are often added, because they make a newcomer's product worth less to buyers no matter how good it is.
How do firms overcome switching costs?
A challenger usually pays the cost on the customer's behalf, through introductory pricing, paying off the old contract, free data migration or tools that keep the old system working. The offer has to beat the customer's one time cost of moving, not just the incumbent's monthly price. That is why deep first year discounts are common in markets where leaving a supplier is a nuisance.
Live Monopoly graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Live Elasticity graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated