Complementary Goods vs Inferior Good
Complementary Goods and Inferior Good are two Supply & Demand concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Complementary goods are goods that are typically used or consumed together. An inferior good is a good for which demand decreases as consumers' income rises and increases as income falls. Here is how they compare side by side.
When the price of one good increases, the demand for its complement decreases, as consumers buy less of both goods. Examples include cars and gasoline, or printers and ink cartridges.
Inferior goods have a negative relationship between income and demand. As consumers' incomes rise, they switch to more expensive substitutes, causing demand for the inferior good to fall. Examples include generic products or public transportation.
Complementary Goods vs Inferior Good: Two Different Classification Tests
| Complementary Goods | Inferior Good | |
|---|---|---|
| What the label classifies | A relationship between two separate goods | One good's response to buyer income |
| Elasticity that decides it | Cross-price elasticity of demand | Income elasticity of demand |
| What sits in the denominator | Percent change in the other good's price | Percent change in consumer income |
| Sign that confirms the label | Negative, sales fall when the partner good gets pricier | Negative, sales rise when income falls |
| Data you need to test it | Two goods and one price change | One good and one income change |
| What makes demand shift | The partner good's price moving | A boom or a downturn moving income |
| Can the other label apply too | Yes, a complement can be normal or inferior | Yes, an inferior good can have complements |
Both tests hand back a negative number, and the two negatives mean different things
Complement and inferior answer different questions, and the fastest way to keep them apart is to look at what sits under the percent change. Cross-price elasticity divides the percent change in one good's quantity demanded by the percent change in a different good's price. If a 20 percent rise in printer prices cuts cartridge sales by 12 percent, the elasticity is negative 12 over 20, or negative 0.6, so printers and cartridges are complements. Income elasticity divides the percent change in quantity demanded by the percent change in income. If income falls 10 percent and canned soup sales rise 4 percent, the elasticity is 4 over negative 10, or negative 0.4, so soup is inferior. Both answers came back negative, and a student who has memorised only that a negative sign means complements will file the soup under a partner good that was never mentioned. The denominator is the tell: another good's price means cross-price, buyer income means income elasticity. Work each formula at /calculate/cross-price-elasticity and /calculate/income-elasticity-of-demand.
The case where the two labels pull one demand curve in opposite directions
Because the labels are independent, a single good can carry both, and then one scenario moves its demand two ways at once. Take intercity bus travel, an inferior good with an income elasticity of negative 0.5, paired with cheap roadside motels, a complement to it with a cross-price elasticity of negative 0.4. Now let household income rise 10 percent in the same period that motel prices fall 15 percent. The income channel gives negative 0.5 times 10, a 5 percent fall in demand for bus trips. The cross-price channel gives negative 0.4 times negative 15, a 6 percent rise. Net demand rises about 1 percent, so the curve shifts slightly right even though the good is inferior and incomes went up. Keeping the labels separate is what makes that answer available: each classification delivers the sign of one effect, never the direction of the final shift. Free-response prompts lean on this by naming two determinants in one sentence and asking what happens to equilibrium price, where the honest answer is often indeterminate until you know the magnitudes. Definitions for both measures sit at /glossary/cross-price-elasticity-of-demand and /glossary/income-elasticity-of-demand.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between complementary goods and an inferior good?
Complementary goods is a label about a pair: buying more of one goes with buying more of the other, confirmed by a negative cross-price elasticity. Inferior good is a label about one good and buyer income, confirmed by a negative income elasticity, meaning people buy more of it when they earn less. One test compares a quantity with another good's price, the other compares a quantity with income.
Does a negative elasticity always mean two goods are complements?
No. A negative result identifies complements only when the denominator is another good's price. A negative income elasticity identifies an inferior good, and a negative price elasticity of demand is just the law of demand showing up, which is why most textbooks report that one in absolute value. Check what the percent change on the bottom refers to before attaching any label.
Can a good be both an inferior good and a complement?
Yes. The two labels answer different questions, so nothing stops a good from being inferior with respect to income and a complement with respect to a partner good. Instant noodles with an income elasticity of negative 0.4 can sit alongside seasoning packets whose cross-price elasticity against noodle prices is negative 0.5. Both figures are negative, and each one describes a separate determinant of demand.
Live Supply and Demand graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated