EconLearn

Marginal Tax Rate vs Payroll Tax

Marginal Tax Rate and Payroll Tax are two Public Finance & Taxation concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. The marginal tax rate is the tax rate applied to the next dollar of income earned. A payroll tax is a tax on wages and salaries, usually split between employer and employee, that funds social insurance programs. Here is how they compare side by side.

Marginal Tax Rate

In a progressive system it is the rate of your top bracket. It drives incentives to work and invest because it determines how much of additional income you keep. It is usually higher than the average tax rate.

Marginal tax rate = Δtax paid ÷ Δincome.
Payroll Tax

A payroll tax applies to earnings from work rather than to all income, so wages are taxed but interest, dividends and capital gains are not. The statutory burden is often split, with half withheld from the worker's check and half paid by the employer, but because labor supply is relatively inelastic, workers bear most of the true burden either way. Many payroll taxes apply only up to an annual earnings cap, so a worker earning far above the cap pays the same dollar amount as one right at it and therefore a smaller share of total income. That cap is why the payroll tax is regressive at the top, while an income tax with rising marginal rates is progressive.

Payroll tax owed = tax rate × earnings, up to the annual earnings cap (no additional tax on earnings above the cap)

Marginal Tax Rate vs Payroll Tax: One Is a Rate, the Other Is a Levy That Changes It

Marginal Tax RatePayroll Tax
What the term namesThe percentage charged on the next dollar of incomeA tax on wages and salaries, split on paper between worker and employer
What income it reachesWhatever the schedule makes taxable, wages and other income alikeWages only, so interest, dividends and realized gains escape it
How it moves as income risesSteps up at each threshold in a progressive scheduleFlat inside the wage ceiling, then zero on wages above it
What it contributes to the combined rateA component that rises and never fallsA component that switches off at the ceiling, which can pull the total down
Who appears to payThe person whose income is taxedEmployer and worker in named halves, though incidence follows elasticities
Where the real wedge is measuredAgainst gross income on the payslipAgainst total employer cost, which includes the half no payslip shows
What it fundsGeneral revenue, with no earmark impliedSocial insurance, usually with earmarked accounts and benefit entitlements

Adding the payroll tax makes the combined marginal rate fall in the middle

Take a hypothetical income tax of 12 percent up to 50,000, 25 percent from 50,000 to 200,000 and 35 percent above that, alongside a payroll tax charging the worker 8 percent on wages up to a ceiling of 120,000. Walk up the wage distribution and add the two rates the worker actually faces on the next dollar. At 40,000 the combined marginal rate is 12 plus 8, or 20 percent. At 90,000 it is 25 plus 8, or 33 percent. At 150,000 the ceiling has been passed, the payroll component is gone, and the combined rate is 25 percent. At 250,000 it is 35 percent. The sequence runs 20, then 33, then 25, then 35. A worker on 150,000 keeps more of the next dollar than a worker on 90,000 does, even though the income tax alone rises everywhere and falls nowhere. Nothing in the income tax schedule produced that dip and nothing in the payroll rate produced it either. The ceiling did. This is the most common reason a statutory income tax schedule looks progressive while the marginal rate profile actually facing wage earners is not.

Which dollar it is matters as much as how big it is

Marginal tax rate is a phrase about a person's income, but the payroll tax cares what kind of income it is. Wages sit inside the base while interest, dividends and realized gains sit outside it. Two people with identical total income can therefore face different combined marginal rates, the wage earner paying the payroll component on the next dollar and the investor paying none. That is one of the few places where the marginal rate depends on the source of income rather than its size, and it is worth saying out loud in any answer about whether a system treats equal incomes equally. Keep two claims apart when you write about this. The claim in the first section concerns marginal rates and the ceiling. The familiar classroom claim that a payroll tax is regressive concerns average rates: once wages pass the ceiling, the share of total wages taken by the tax falls as wages rise. Both are true and they are separate arguments with separate evidence. Blending them produces an answer that sounds right and scores nothing. Build an average rate yourself at /calculate/effective-tax-rate.

Frequently asked questions

Does the payroll tax count toward your marginal tax rate?

The payroll tax belongs in any marginal rate meant to describe incentives, since it lands on the same next dollar of wages the income tax reaches. A worker facing 25 percent income tax and an 8 percent worker payroll share keeps 67 cents of the next dollar of gross wage rather than 75. Exam questions that say marginal tax rate normally mean the income tax alone, so check whether the prompt has actually handed you a payroll rate before adding one in.

Why can a higher-paid worker face a lower marginal tax rate?

A wage ceiling on the payroll tax can do it. On the schedule above, a worker on 90,000 pays 25 percent income tax plus 8 percent payroll on the next dollar, a combined 33 percent, while a worker on 150,000 has passed the 120,000 ceiling and pays only the 25 percent income tax. The higher earner keeps more of the next dollar. An income tax alone never falls as income rises, but the combined rate can, because one of its components switches off.

Does the employer half of the payroll tax affect the worker?

Most economists conclude that workers bear the larger part of the employer share, because labor supply responds weakly to small wage changes and the burden settles on whichever side of the market is less responsive. Measured properly, an extra hour costing the firm 108 leaves the worker with 67 in the example above, a wedge of 41 that no payslip displays. Calling half of it the employer's share fixes who writes the check, not who ends up poorer.

See it move

Live Supply and Demand graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.

Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox

Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.

Keep track of what you have studied

A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.

Create a free account

Already have one? Sign in

Last updated

← Back to the glossary
AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, EconLearn.