EconLearn

Returns to Scale vs Economies of Scale

Returns to Scale and Economies of Scale are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Returns to scale describes how output responds when a firm scales all inputs up by the same proportion in the long run. Economies of scale occur when long-run average total cost decreases as output increases. Here is how they compare side by side.

Returns to Scale

Returns to scale asks what happens to output when every input rises by the same factor. If doubling all inputs more than doubles output, the firm has increasing returns to scale; if output exactly doubles, returns are constant; if output less than doubles, returns are decreasing. This is strictly a long-run idea, because in the long run there are no fixed inputs and the firm can change plant size along with labor. Diminishing marginal returns is a different, short-run idea: at least one input (usually capital) is fixed and only the variable input rises, so each extra worker eventually adds less output. A firm can have increasing returns to scale in the long run and diminishing marginal returns in the short run at the same time.

Scale every input by t > 1: increasing returns if Q(tK, tL) > t × Q(K, L); constant if Q(tK, tL) = t × Q(K, L); decreasing if Q(tK, tL) < t × Q(K, L)
Economies of Scale

This happens due to factors like specialization, bulk purchasing, or more efficient technology as the firm expands. It leads to lower per-unit costs and gives larger firms a cost advantage in the market.

Returns to Scale vs Economies of Scale: One Counts Output, the Other Counts Cost

Returns to ScaleEconomies of Scale
What it describesHow output responds when all inputs rise in the same proportionHow long run average total cost responds as output expands
Units of the answerPhysical output compared with the input multipleDollars of cost per unit
Do input prices matterNo, it is a property of the technology aloneYes, a bulk discount can create it on its own
Where it is read fromThe production function or the spacing of an isoquant mapThe slope of the long run average total cost curve
Names for the three casesIncreasing, constant and decreasing returns to scaleEconomies, constant returns and diseconomies of scale
Direction of the implicationIncreasing returns do imply falling cost per unit if input prices hold stillFalling cost per unit does not prove increasing returns

A firm can have constant returns to scale and still get cheaper per unit

Start with a plant using a bundle of inputs that costs 1,000 dollars and produces 100 units, so average total cost is 10 dollars. Double every input. If output rises to exactly 200 units, the technology shows constant returns to scale. Now ask what happens to cost per unit, and the answer depends on something the production function never mentioned: input prices. At unchanged prices the input bill doubles to 2,000 dollars, output doubles to 200 units, and average total cost is still 10 dollars. But suppose ordering in larger quantities cuts the bill to 1,800 dollars instead of 2,000. Average total cost is now 1,800 divided by 200, or 9 dollars a unit. The firm has economies of scale with no increasing returns to scale anywhere in sight. Run the reverse case for the other direction. Suppose doubling the inputs raises output to 240 units, which is increasing returns to scale, and the bill doubles to 2,000 dollars. Average total cost falls to 2,000 divided by 240, about 8.33 dollars. Here the technology did the work. These figures are illustrative.

Returns to scale is a statement about the isoquant map, not about the cost curve

The neatest way to keep the two apart is to remember which diagram each one lives on. Returns to scale is read off the spacing of isoquants along a ray from the origin. If doubling both inputs lands you on an isoquant labeled more than twice the original output, returns to scale are increasing; land on exactly double and they are constant. No dollar figure appears anywhere in that reading, because the isoquant map is a picture of technology. See /glossary/isoquant for how those curves are drawn. Economies of scale, by contrast, is read off the long run average total cost curve, and every point on it already has input prices baked in. This is why exam answers that use the two phrases interchangeably lose marks. It also explains the practical sources listed for each. Increasing returns usually come from specialization and from equipment that only works well above a certain size. Economies of scale can come from those same technical facts or from purely financial ones, including bulk purchasing and cheaper borrowing. For the upward sloping end of the same curve, see /glossary/diseconomies-of-scale.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between returns to scale and economies of scale?

Returns to scale describes how physical output responds when every input is scaled up by the same proportion, while economies of scale describes how cost per unit responds as output expands. The first ignores prices entirely and the second cannot be worked out without them.

Does constant returns to scale mean constant average cost?

Only if input prices stay the same as the firm gets bigger. With constant returns, doubling inputs doubles output, so average cost is unchanged at unchanged prices, but a bulk discount would still push cost per unit down and create economies of scale.

How do you tell returns to scale from a Cobb-Douglas production function?

Add the exponents on the inputs: a sum above one gives increasing returns, a sum of exactly one gives constant returns, and a sum below one gives decreasing returns. For a function with exponents of 0.3 on capital and 0.7 on labor the sum is one, so doubling both inputs doubles output.

See it move

Live Production Costs graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.

Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox

Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.

Keep track of what you have studied

A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.

Create a free account

Already have one? Sign in

Last updated

← Back to the glossary
AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, EconLearn.