Total Surplus vs Deadweight Loss
Total Surplus and Deadweight Loss are two Supply & Demand concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Total surplus is the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus. Deadweight loss is the loss of total surplus that occurs when a market is not at its efficient competitive equilibrium. Here is how they compare side by side.
It represents the total net benefit to society from the production and consumption of a good or service. At the equilibrium price and quantity, total surplus is maximized.
It measures mutually beneficial trades that fail to occur because of a price control, tax, monopoly, or externality. On a supply-and-demand graph it is the triangular area between the demand and supply curves over the units no longer traded. A market is allocatively efficient when deadweight loss is zero.
Total Surplus vs Deadweight Loss: Gains Captured and Gains Missed
| Total Surplus | Deadweight Loss | |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | Gains from trade that are actually captured | Gains from trade that never happen |
| How it is built | Consumer surplus plus producer surplus | The largest possible total surplus minus the total surplus achieved |
| Area on the diagram | Between the demand and supply curves, out to the quantity traded | The triangle between the curves, from the quantity traded out to the efficient quantity |
| Value at competitive equilibrium | At its maximum | Zero |
| Direction it moves when a tax is imposed | Falls | Rises above zero |
| Who ends up holding it | Buyers and sellers, split into the two surpluses | Nobody, since it is not transferred to anyone |
Deadweight loss is the slice of total surplus a distortion destroys instead of moving
Total surplus counts the value that trading creates. Deadweight loss counts the value a distortion stops from being created. Both are measured in the same units on the same diagram, which is why they get confused, but one is an area that exists and the other is an area that is missing. Take an illustrative market with demand P equal to 100 minus Q and supply P equal to Q. They cross at a quantity of 50 and a price of 50. Consumer surplus is half of 50 times 50, which is 1,250, and producer surplus is the same, so total surplus is 2,500. Now put a tax of 20 per unit on the market. Buyers end up paying 60, sellers end up keeping 40, and quantity falls to 40 units. Consumer surplus becomes half of 40 times 40, or 800, and producer surplus is also 800. The government collects 20 times 40, another 800. Those three amounts add to 2,400, so 100 of the original value has vanished. That 100 is the deadweight loss, and it matches the triangle formula of half times the tax of 20 times the 10 units no longer traded. Work more of these at /calculate/deadweight-loss.
A transfer is not a loss, so the two figures answer different questions
When a tax moves money from buyers and sellers to the government, the value that moves is still enjoyed by someone, so it is not deadweight loss. In the market above, the 800 collected in revenue left the two private surpluses and reappeared as public funds. Only the 100 that reaches nobody counts as deadweight loss. That is why a question about what happened to total surplus and a question about deadweight loss can have different answers. Some courses fold tax revenue into total surplus and some do not, so read the wording. Counting revenue as part of society's total, the figure fell from 2,500 to 2,400 and the drop equals the deadweight loss exactly. Counting only consumer plus producer surplus, the figure fell from 2,500 to 1,600, and most of that drop is a transfer rather than a loss. Deadweight loss always comes from units that stop trading. Every unit between the new quantity and the efficient quantity was worth more to a buyer than it cost a seller, so each carried a gain that is now forgone. Anything pushing quantity away from the efficient level does this: taxes, binding price controls, monopoly pricing and unpriced externalities. See /calculate/total-surplus for the areas.
Frequently asked questions
Is deadweight loss part of total surplus?
No, deadweight loss is surplus that never gets created, so it belongs to no total at all. It is measured as the difference between the largest total surplus a market could reach and the total surplus it does reach. At the competitive equilibrium of a market with no externalities, deadweight loss is zero and total surplus is at its maximum.
How do you calculate deadweight loss from a tax?
Multiply half the tax per unit by the fall in the quantity traded, because the lost area is a triangle whose height is the tax and whose base is the drop in quantity. A tax of 12 per unit that cuts quantity by 5 units creates a deadweight loss of 30. The shortcut assumes straight line demand and supply curves.
Does tax revenue count as deadweight loss?
No, tax revenue is a transfer rather than a loss, since the money leaves buyers and sellers but is received by the government and spent. Deadweight loss is the separate amount that reaches nobody, created by the trades that stop taking place. A tax usually produces both, and only the second part is its efficiency cost.
Live Supply and Demand graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated