Convergence (Catch-Up Effect)
What is Convergence (Catch-Up Effect)?
The catch-up (convergence) effect is the tendency for poorer economies to grow faster than rich ones because capital has higher returns where it is scarce.
Because of diminishing returns to capital, a country with little capital per worker earns high returns on new investment and can grow quickly by adopting existing technology, so it tends to 'catch up' to richer economies. This conditional convergence holds for economies with similar saving rates, institutions, and access to technology, which converge toward the same steady state. It is a key prediction of the Solow growth model. Persistent income gaps across countries are often attributed to differences in institutions and human capital that prevent convergence.
Convergence (Catch-Up Effect): a worked example
Give two economies the same production function, output per worker = 10 x the square root of k, where k is capital per worker. Alta starts at k = 100 and produces 10 x 10 = 100 per worker. Bora starts at k = 400 and produces 10 x 20 = 200. Now hand each the identical investment, 25 more units of capital per worker. Alta reaches 10 x the square root of 125 = 111.8, growth of 11.8 percent. Bora reaches 10 x the square root of 425 = 206.2, growth of 3.1 percent. Same machines, same technology, and the poorer economy grows nearly four times faster.
The mistake students make with convergence (catch-up effect)
The catch-up effect gets read as a promise that every poor country closes the gap, which the theory never claims. Convergence is conditional: economies approach each other only if they share saving rates, institutions and access to technology, since those set the steady state each one is heading toward. A country with weak property rights and thin schooling converges to its own low steady state and stays poor. The error is tempting because diminishing returns sound automatic.
Convergence (Catch-Up Effect) questions
Why do poorer countries grow faster than richer ones?
Poorer countries can grow faster because capital is scarce there, and diminishing returns mean each extra machine, road or factory adds more output where little capital is already in place. They can also adopt technology that exists elsewhere rather than inventing it. Both advantages fade as capital per worker rises, which is why rapid growth tends to slow once an economy has caught up part of the way.
What is the difference between absolute and conditional convergence?
Absolute convergence claims all economies head toward the same income level, so poorer ones always grow faster. Conditional convergence claims each economy heads toward its own steady state, set by its saving rate, population growth, institutions and technology, and grows faster the further below that particular target it starts. The conditional version is what the Solow model actually predicts.
Does the catch-up effect mean incomes will eventually be equal everywhere?
The catch-up effect does not imply equal incomes everywhere. It implies that two economies sharing the same underlying conditions end up at the same level, and that whichever starts further behind travels faster. Where saving rates, schooling, rule of law or openness to technology differ, the steady states differ too, and a permanent income gap is entirely consistent with the model.
Related terms
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated