Dual Labor Market
What is Dual Labor Market?
A dual labor market is split into a primary segment of stable, well paid jobs and a low wage, high turnover secondary segment, with little mobility between.
Firms with steady product demand, heavy capital and firm-specific skills find it worthwhile to train workers, pay above-market wages to hold on to them and promote from within, which builds a primary segment with career ladders and job security. Firms facing seasonal or volatile demand push that risk onto a secondary segment of casual, easily replaced positions with low pay, thin benefits and no training. Because the good jobs are rationed rather than auctioned off, a queue forms, and credential screening, referral networks, geography and discrimination decide who reaches the front of it. The prediction is that two workers with the same measured schooling and experience can earn persistently different wages depending on which segment hires them, something a purely competitive model rules out. The weakness is identification: unmeasured differences in ability or motivation could sort workers the same way, so segmentation and ordinary sorting are hard to tell apart in wage data.
Dual Labor Market: a worked example
Two workers finish the same two-year degree. One is hired in the primary segment at $28 an hour for 2,000 hours, with benefits worth 25 percent of wages: 28 times 2,000 = $56,000 in wages, plus 0.25 times 56,000 = $14,000 in benefits, giving $70,000 of total compensation. The other lands in the secondary segment at $15 an hour with no benefits, and gaps between short jobs leave only 1,700 paid hours: 15 times 1,700 = $25,500. The gap is $44,500 a year, so the primary worker earns about 2.7 times the secondary worker on identical credentials. A competitive model says the second worker simply moves to the first kind of job; segmentation says the queue for those jobs is long and she stays where she is.
The mistake students make with dual labor market
The two segments get read as skilled workers versus unskilled workers. The theory is about jobs, not people, and its whole claim is that two workers with the same schooling, experience and measured skill can be paid very differently because of which segment employs them. Calling the secondary segment the place where low-skill workers belong assumes away the segmentation being argued for, and it also hides the prediction the theory is judged on: persistent wage gaps between observationally identical workers.
Dual Labor Market questions
How is this different from saying that some jobs simply pay more than others?
Wage dispersion on its own is consistent with a competitive market, where better-paid jobs compensate for harder or riskier work, or reflect more productive workers. Dual labor market theory makes a stronger claim: barriers separate the two segments, so the same worker is paid differently depending on which side she lands on, and pay attaches partly to the job rather than only to the person. That is why the theory predicts queues for good jobs and persistent wage gaps across industries among workers who look identical on paper.
What keeps workers from moving into the primary segment?
Primary jobs are rationed, because firms paying above-market wages to hold down turnover always have more applicants than openings. Employers then screen on credentials, referrals and unbroken work histories, and secondary-segment work erodes those signals rather than building them. Geography, licensing requirements, care responsibilities and discrimination narrow the opening further, so time spent in the secondary segment can make crossing over harder instead of easier.
Does segmentation change what to expect from a minimum wage?
It can. If secondary-segment employers have some wage-setting power rather than facing a perfectly competitive labor market, a moderate minimum wage can raise pay with much smaller employment losses than the textbook competitive model predicts, and in some monopsony models it raises employment. The result is bounded: pushed far enough above the competitive wage, a minimum wage cuts employment in any of these models. The empirical size of the effect is still actively contested.
Related terms
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated