Resource Curse
What is Resource Curse?
The resource curse is the pattern in which countries rich in oil or minerals often grow more slowly and govern worse than countries without them.
Several channels are proposed. Dutch disease hollows out manufacturing; resource prices swing violently, which makes budgets and investment plans unstable; large rents invite rent-seeking, corruption and sometimes armed conflict over control of the deposits; and a government funded by oil rather than by taxes has weaker reasons to answer to its citizens. Countries also borrow heavily against reserves during booms and face painful cuts when prices fall. The finding is contested, and the modern view is that resources are not automatically a curse: the outcome depends on the institutions in place before the discovery. Norway, Botswana and Chile are the standard counterexamples, all of which managed resource revenue through explicit fiscal rules or savings funds.
Resource Curse: a worked example
Picture an economy where oil is 90 percent of export earnings and funds 60 percent of the government budget. The world oil price halves, so total export revenue drops by roughly 45 percent almost overnight, and the government must either cut spending hard, borrow, or print money. Compare that with Norway, which puts petroleum revenue into a fund invested entirely outside the country and, under its fiscal rule, transfers only a small share of the fund's value into the budget each year. Same commodity, same price crash, completely different exposure, and the difference is the rule rather than the geology.
The mistake students make with resource curse
The word curse makes students think resources reliably cause poverty. They do not: Norway, Botswana, Chile and Australia all did well out of them. The evidence for a curse is disputed, and the finding most economists accept is conditional, that resource wealth damages growth where institutions are weak and helps where they are strong. Stating it as an iron law is wrong; describing it as a risk shaped by institutions is the defensible position.
Resource Curse questions
Why would natural resources slow growth?
Resource wealth can slow growth by crowding out other tradable industries, destabilizing budgets and rewarding rent-seeking over production. A booming resource sector raises the real exchange rate and wages, which squeezes manufacturing, while volatile prices make government revenue unpredictable. Large rents also attract corruption and can fund conflict over who controls the deposits.
Is the resource curse the same as Dutch disease?
No, Dutch disease is one channel within the wider resource curse argument. Dutch disease is a precise mechanism about the real exchange rate and the shrinking of other export sectors. The resource curse is a broader claim about growth, institutions, corruption and conflict, and it is far more contested empirically.
How do some countries escape the resource curse?
Countries that avoid it generally had reasonable institutions before the resource money arrived, then wrote rules to manage it. Sovereign wealth funds holding assets abroad, fiscal rules capping how much can be spent in a boom, transparency about who receives payments, and investment in education and non-resource industries are the common ingredients. Sequencing matters, since building institutions after the revenue starts flowing is much harder.
Related terms
Common comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated