Systematic Risk
What is Systematic Risk?
Systematic risk is market-wide risk that moves nearly all assets at once, such as recessions or interest rate shifts, and diversification cannot remove it.
Systematic risk, also called market risk, comes from forces that hit the whole economy: recessions, inflation surprises, interest rate changes, wars, sweeping policy shifts. Because those forces push most assets in the same direction at the same time, adding more securities to a portfolio does not escape them, since the portfolio simply falls together. That is what separates systematic risk from unsystematic risk, which belongs to one firm or industry (a failed product, a strike, a lawsuit) and can be cut close to zero by spreading holdings across many unrelated assets. Standard finance theory concludes that only systematic risk carries a risk premium, since the diversifiable part can be shed at no cost. Beta is the usual measure of how strongly one asset responds to market-wide moves.
Systematic Risk: a worked example
Suppose you own one airline stock. A pilots' strike at that airline is unsystematic risk, and buying forty unrelated stocks shrinks it to a small corner of the portfolio. A recession that cuts travel and squeezes profits everywhere is systematic risk, and all forty-one holdings sag together. Beta puts a number on that exposure: a stock with a beta of 1.5 has historically moved about 1.5 times as much as the market, so a 10 percent market decline lines up with a fall of roughly 15 percent in that stock (1.5 × 10).
The mistake students make with systematic risk
Students conclude that a well diversified portfolio is protected against loss, since diversification is taught as the way to reduce risk. Diversification removes only unsystematic, firm-specific risk. In a broad downturn nearly every holding falls at once, which is why diversified investors still lose money in a crash. Note also that systematic risk is not systemic risk, which means the danger that one institution's failure topples the financial system.
Systematic Risk questions
What is the difference between systematic and unsystematic risk?
Systematic risk affects the whole market and cannot be diversified away, while unsystematic risk affects a single company or industry and can be. A recession is systematic; a fire at one firm's only factory is unsystematic. An asset's total risk is the sum of the two.
How is systematic risk measured?
Systematic risk is usually measured by beta, which compares an asset's past movements with movements of the market as a whole. A beta of 1 means the asset has tended to move with the market, above 1 means it swung more, and below 1 means it swung less. Beta describes only market-wide exposure and says nothing about firm-specific risk.
Is systematic risk the same as systemic risk?
No, they are separate ideas with similar names. Systematic risk is the market-wide part of investment risk that diversification cannot remove. Systemic risk is the danger that the failure of one bank or market spreads until the wider financial system stops working.
Formula / Example
This is the live Business Cycle sandbox. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Related terms
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated