Frictional Unemployment vs Structural Unemployment
Frictional Unemployment and Structural Unemployment are two Unemployment & Inflation concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. Frictional unemployment is short-term unemployment that occurs when people are between jobs or looking for their first job. Structural unemployment is long-term unemployment that occurs when workers' skills do not match the jobs available. Here is how they compare side by side.
Frictional unemployment is a natural part of the job search process and is typically short-lived. It occurs when workers voluntarily leave their jobs to find better ones or when new entrants to the labor force are seeking employment. This type of unemployment is generally considered unavoidable and not a major concern for policymakers.
Structural unemployment happens when there is a mismatch between the skills of the unemployed and the requirements of the available jobs. This can be caused by technological changes, shifts in consumer demand, or the relocation of industries. Structural unemployment often requires workers to retrain or relocate to find new jobs.
Frictional vs Structural Unemployment: Matching Delay or Skills Mismatch
| Frictional unemployment | Structural unemployment | |
|---|---|---|
| Cause | The time it takes to match workers with jobs | A mismatch between workers' skills or location and available jobs |
| Do the jobs exist | Yes, and the worker is qualified for them | Jobs exist but not for these workers as they are |
| Typical duration | Short | Long |
| Examples | A new graduate job hunting, someone who quit to find a better fit | A factory worker replaced by automation, a coal miner in a region that has moved on |
| Part of the natural rate | Yes | Yes |
| What reduces it | Better job matching, job boards, shorter search | Retraining, education, relocation assistance |
| Fixed by expansionary policy | No | No |
Ask whether the worker could take a job today
Frictional unemployment is a timing problem. The jobs exist, the worker is qualified, and the two simply have not found each other yet. Someone who just graduated, or who quit to look for something better, is frictionally unemployed while they search. Structural unemployment is a matching problem of a different kind. The worker cannot do the jobs that exist, because their skills have been made obsolete, or because the jobs are somewhere else. A weaver replaced by a machine and a coal miner in a region that has moved to services are both structurally unemployed, and no amount of searching alone will fix it. The test is whether more search time would solve the problem. If yes, it is frictional. If they need new skills or a new city, it is structural.
Both are in the natural rate, and cyclical is not
This is the exam-critical consequence. The natural rate of unemployment is frictional plus structural, and it is the rate that persists even when the economy is at full employment. Full employment does not mean zero unemployment, because people will always be between jobs and some skill mismatches will always exist. Cyclical unemployment, caused by a downturn in aggregate demand, is the only component that is not in the natural rate, and it is the only one that expansionary fiscal or monetary policy can meaningfully reduce. When a question asks whether the Fed should respond to a described case of unemployment, identify the type first: if it is frictional or structural, the honest answer is that demand-side policy is the wrong tool.
Where the policy answers differ
Because the causes differ, the remedies do too. Frictional unemployment falls when matching improves, so better job boards, employment agencies, and clearer information all help, and it rises when unemployment benefits are generous enough that people search longer, which is not necessarily bad if the eventual match is better. Structural unemployment needs retraining, education, and relocation assistance, all of which take years, which is why structurally unemployed workers stay unemployed far longer. Some frictional unemployment is actually desirable, since a worker who takes an extra month to find a job they are good at is more productive than one who takes the first offer. Nobody says that about structural unemployment.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between frictional and structural unemployment?
Frictional unemployment is the short-term joblessness of people searching for jobs they are qualified for, whether they are between jobs or looking for a first one, caused by the time it takes to search and match. Structural unemployment is longer-term and caused by a mismatch between workers' skills or location and the jobs that exist, so searching alone will not solve it.
Are frictional and structural unemployment part of the natural rate?
Yes, both are. The natural rate of unemployment is frictional plus structural unemployment, and it is the rate that persists when the economy is at full employment. Cyclical unemployment, caused by a downturn in aggregate demand, is the component that is not included.
Is a laid-off factory worker frictionally or structurally unemployed?
It depends on why the job went. If the factory closed in a recession and will rehire when demand recovers, that is cyclical. If the job was automated away or moved permanently and the worker's skills are no longer in demand, it is structural. If the worker is qualified for jobs that exist and is simply looking, it is frictional.
Related comparisons
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated