Natural Monopoly vs Minimum Efficient Scale
Natural Monopoly and Minimum Efficient Scale are related concepts in AP Economics that students often mix up. A natural monopoly occurs when a single firm can produce the entire market output at a lower average total cost than multiple firms could. Minimum efficient scale is the smallest output at which a firm reaches the lowest point on its long-run average total cost curve. Here is how they compare side by side.
This typically happens in industries with very high fixed costs and low marginal costs, such as utilities, where economies of scale are so large that one firm is more efficient than many. Government regulation is often used to prevent abuse of market power.
Minimum efficient scale marks the output where economies of scale run out. Below it a firm carries a genuine unit-cost disadvantage, so it either grows or loses to larger rivals, while at or above it the cost per unit is as low as the technology allows. Comparing that scale with the size of the market predicts the structure: if efficient scale is a small fraction of total demand, many firms can coexist at minimum cost and the market looks competitive; if one efficient plant could supply most of the market, only a few firms fit; and if a single plant could supply all of it, the result is a natural monopoly. It is a long-run idea, measured on the curve where every input including plant size can vary, so it is not the minimum of any one short-run average total cost curve.
Natural Monopoly vs Minimum Efficient Scale: A Market Outcome and a Point on a Cost Curve
| Natural Monopoly | Minimum Efficient Scale | |
|---|---|---|
| What the term names | A condition of a market: one firm can serve it more cheaply than several | An output level: the smallest quantity that reaches lowest average cost |
| What you need in order to identify it | The cost curve and the size of market demand | The cost curve on its own |
| What it is expressed in | A yes or no judgement about the market | A quantity, such as 50,000 units a year |
| Behavior of average cost | Still falling at the quantity buyers actually want | Stops falling at exactly this quantity |
| How the two connect | Arises when that scale is large next to market demand | Divided into market demand, it predicts how many firms fit |
| Policy that follows | Regulate the price or auction the right to operate | None, since it is a fact about technology |
| Where you meet it | Water mains, local distribution grids, rail track | Every industry, competitive ones included |
Duplicating the network costs money and produces nothing extra
Take an illustrative distribution network with a fixed cost of 1,000,000 dollars and a cost of 2 dollars for each unit delivered. Suppose buyers want 500,000 units. One firm spends 1,000,000 dollars plus 2 dollars on each of 500,000 units, which is 2,000,000 dollars in total, or 4 dollars a unit on average. Now split the same 500,000 units evenly between two firms. Each one pays its own 1,000,000 dollars of fixed cost plus 2 dollars on 250,000 units, so each spends 1,500,000 dollars and the industry spends 3,000,000 dollars. Average cost per unit is now 6 dollars. Nothing extra was produced. The second network cost the economy an extra 1,000,000 dollars and delivered the same 500,000 units to the same customers. That is the whole definition of a natural monopoly: the cheapest way to serve the market is with one firm. Notice that the conclusion depended on the 500,000 unit figure as much as on the cost numbers, which is where the second term comes in. You can rerun this comparison with your own figures at /calculate/average-total-cost.
Divide the market by the efficient scale and you get the number of firms that fit
Minimum efficient scale is a fact about the cost curve alone, and you can read it off without knowing anything about demand. It is the smallest output at which long run average cost stops falling. Suppose that happens at 50,000 units a year for a given technology. If buyers want 600,000 units a year, then 600,000 divided by 50,000 is 12, so a dozen firms could each run at lowest cost, and the market has room to be competitive. If buyers want only 60,000 units, roughly one firm fits at efficient scale, a second would be stuck producing at high cost, and the market tips toward a single seller. Same cost curve, same technology, different answer, because market size changed. Two errors are common on exams. The first is calling any industry with a huge fixed cost a natural monopoly; what matters is whether average cost is still falling at the quantity buyers actually buy. The second is treating efficient scale as a policy problem, when it is just a property of the production process. Review how average cost curves are built at /micro/production-costs.
Frequently asked questions
Is minimum efficient scale the same as a natural monopoly?
No, minimum efficient scale is a quantity read off a firm's cost curve, while natural monopoly is a conclusion about a market that you can only reach after comparing that quantity with how much buyers want. A large efficient scale creates a natural monopoly only when market demand is small next to it. The same technology can support one seller in a small market and many in a large one.
How does minimum efficient scale determine the number of firms in an industry?
Divide the quantity the market buys by the minimum efficient scale, and the result is roughly the largest number of firms that can all operate at lowest average cost. A big ratio points to a competitive structure, and a ratio near one points to a single efficient seller. The estimate is rough, because firms can survive slightly below efficient scale if buyers value what makes them different.
Why does a natural monopoly have falling average cost?
Because a very large fixed cost is spread over every unit sold, so the fixed cost per unit keeps shrinking as output grows, and it never stops shrinking within the range the market buys. Pipes, tracks and cables cost the same whether they carry a little or a lot. That is why one operator delivering the whole quantity beats two operators each delivering half.
Live Monopoly graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Live Production Costs graph. Drag the curves, or open the full version.
Get AP Econ exam tips in your inbox
Occasional emails with study tips, new interactive graphs, and exam-season reminders. Free, no spam.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
Keep track of what you have studied
A free EconLearn account adds progress tracking, your quiz history, and achievements. Studying here is free either way, and there is nothing to pay for as a student.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Sign in
Last updated